Cases 151 - 160 of 178
LANE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2010cv00098
Petitioner:
MARK A. LANE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Medina et al v. Garretson et al
as 1:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
Travis Medina, Travis Medina, Sarah Medina and others
Defendant:
Joseph A Garretson, Robin W Hunt, Lane K Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
Stacie L Lane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LANE v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2009cv00254
Petitioner:
HOWARD BENTON LANE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LANE v. PETERS
as 4:2009cv00104
Plaintiff:
JASON LANE
Respondent:
GILBERT PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant:
DANNY RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant:
DANNY RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. JEFFERSONVILLE EVENING NEWS
as 4:2009cv00062
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant:
JEFFERSONVILLE EVENING NEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2009cv00061
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant:
DANNY RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. JEFFERSONVILLE EVENING NEWS
as 4:2009cv00041
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN J. LANE, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFERSONVILLE EVENING NEWS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
