Cases 151 - 160 of 17,225
Geer v. Dean et al
as 1:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Geer
Defendant:
Mr. Dean, Mr. John Doe, Mr. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1445 Immigration: Application for Naturalization
Blake v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv00901
Petitioner:
Leeander Jerome Blake
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brailford v. State of Maryland
as 1:2024cv00568
Petitioner:
Michael T. Brailford
Respondent:
State of Maryland and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Goines v. Yes Care Corporation
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Derrell L. Goines
Defendant:
Yes Care Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Prince George's County Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
James Johnte' Dorsey
Defendant:
Prince George's County Police Dept., Detective Windsor and Detective Ann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Foster
as 1:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Keishon Javontae Thompson
Defendant:
Director B. Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dick III v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
David Ellsworth Dick III
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
