Civil Rights Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 151 - 160 of 4,335
Bonneau v. Kroger Company et al
as 3:2023cv01776
Plaintiff: Ryan Bieber Bonneau
Defendant: Kroger Company, Portland Police Bureau, Multnomah County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartmess v. Beamer et al
as 6:2023cv01930
Plaintiff: Shawn Michael Bartmess
Defendant: Dr. Leland Beamer, Dr. Karen Harris, Dr. Benjamin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Beltran v. Marion County Sheriff Department
as 6:2023cv01912
Plaintiff: Jose Manuel Beltran
Defendant: Marion County Sheriff Department, Deputy Frieze, Deputy Kevin Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonneau v. Choice Hotels International
as 3:2023cv01837
Plaintiff: Ryan Bieber Bonneau
Defendant: Choice Hotels International
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bogosian v. Washington County Courts
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff: James Leroy Bogosian
Defendant: Washington County Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larsen v. Reyes et al
as 2:2023cv01917
Plaintiff: Russel Larsen
Defendant: Superintendent Erin Reyes, C/O Gutierrez, C/O Grey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Champagne v. Taite
as 2:2023cv01717
Plaintiff: Michael Champagne
Defendant: Judge Eric Taite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beyer v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2024cv00037
Plaintiff: Bryan Martin Beyer
Defendant: Deschutes County, Michael Molan, Andrew Farey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easom v. Samson Tug and Barge
as 6:2023cv01860
Plaintiff: Warren Edwin Easom
Defendant: Samson Tug and Barge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Papa-Vicente v. State of Oregon
as 3:2023cv01934
Petitioner: Duarte Papa-Vicente
Respondent: State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?