Cases 151 - 160 of 68,574
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Nelson v. Clark
as 1:2024cv00272
Petitioner:
James Robert Nelson
Respondent:
Harold Clark and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Clay et al
as 1:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Clay and Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Williams, Moore, Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrick v. O'Boyle
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Fredric Kendrick
Defendant:
Taylor O'Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
De Souza v. CNA Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
Constance De Souza
Defendant:
Cna Financial Corporation, National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, Peraton, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
RRG Global Holdings, LLC et al v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
as 1:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
RRG Global Holdings, LLC and Andrew Udo Chukwura
Defendant:
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
