Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 161 - 170 of 32,683
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10778
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In Re: Moller
as 24-1294
Petitioner: MICHAEL J. MOLLER
Interested Party: SOVEREIGN BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, ROCKLAND TRUST COMPANY and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 24-1220
Plaintiff: MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity and JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity
Appellant: RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Interested Party: CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
DELEO v. JONES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00226
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Raby v. Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10761
Plaintiff: Gerald Raby
Defendant: Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. f/k/a NewHold Investment Corp., Peter George, Mario Ramos and others
US v. Medina, et al
as 24-1282
Appellant: UNITED STATES
Defendant: EDGAR MEDINA, ALIJAH PARSONS, ANDRES GARAY and others
US v. Newton
as 24-1278
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: FAITH NEWTON
US v. Pagan-Diaz
as 24-1287
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: JOSUE PAGAN-DIAZ
Chanchavac Garcia, et al v. Garland
as 24-1296
Petitioner: VENTURA CHANCHAVAC GARCIA and ROSA CLEOTILDE TEMA LOPEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?