Cases 161 - 170 of 181
Velasquez v. Goord et al
as 1:2007cv00208
Plaintiff:
Harry Velasquez
Defendant:
Glenn S. Goord, Glenn S. Goord, Lucien J. Leclaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford v. Dennison et al
as 1:2007cv00191
Plaintiff:
Mauern Jerome Ashford
Defendant:
Robert Dennison, Glenn S. Goord, T. E. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Auleta v. Goord et al
as 9:2007cv00307
Plaintiff:
Francis Auleta
Defendant:
Glenn S. Goord and Mark J. Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowlkes v. Rodriquez et al
as 1:2007cv01193
Plaintiff:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant:
Rodriquez, Edward M. Adler, Dennis Breslin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasquez v. Goord et al
as 1:2007cv02185
Plaintiff:
Harry Velasquez
Defendant:
Glenn S. Goord, Glenn S. Goord, Lucien J. Leclaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Greene et al
as 9:2007cv00239
Plaintiff:
Antonio Saunders
Defendant:
Superintendent Greene, Potter, Glenn S. Goorde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowlkes v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2007cv01908
Plaintiff:
Felipe Oreze Fowlkes
Defendant:
Rodriguez, Edward M. Adler, Dennis Breslin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Word v. Croce et al
as 1:2007cv01894
Plaintiff:
Diane Word
Defendant:
Alan J. Croce, Comm. Glenn S. Goord, Lester N. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Paulson et al
as 9:2007cv00118
Plaintiff:
Donnell Jefferson
Defendant:
Henry Paulson, Jr., Glenn S. Goord and Mark Nell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Goord
as 6:2007cv06054
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
Glenn S. Goord
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
