Cases 161 - 170 of 6,408
Duarte v. United States District Court et al
as 1:2023cv11933
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Defendant:
United States District Court, Clerk Manager, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monteiro v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2023cv11609
Petitioner:
Keon Monteiro
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Alves
as 1:2023cv11822
Plaintiff:
Omar Bonner
Defendant:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kostka v. Rodriguez
as 1:2023cv11428
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kostka
Respondent:
Michael Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Figueroa Garcia v. Zodak
as 1:2023cv11432
Petitioner:
Werner Figueroa Garcia
Respondent:
Scott Zodak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hem v. Suffolk County House of Correction
as 1:2023cv11767
Petitioner:
Timmy Hem
Respondent:
Suffolk County House of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duarte v. Frane
as 1:2023cv11731
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Defendant:
Danielle Frane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2023cv11660
Petitioner:
Steven L Smith
Respondent:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2023cv11557
Defendant:
Orzon Rubio, Bristol County District Attorney's Office, Bristol County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Evans Emons Stroman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
