Cases 161 - 170 of 153,973
Elghembri v. Doe, Dentist et al
as 3:2024cv02771
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dentist, John Doe, Dentist and Theodore Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. White et al
as 3:2024cv02773
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
Dr. White, Rachel Chen and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinnamon v. Thich
as 3:2024cv02784
Plaintiff:
Todd Lee Kinnamon
Defendant:
Thich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shah v. Hero Labs, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02777
Plaintiff:
Vishal Shah
Defendant:
Hero Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re Special Attorney to the United States Attorney General Kevin T. Shaw
as 3:2024mc80111
Not Yet Classified:
Kevin T. Shaw
Knob v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv02767
Plaintiff:
Charon Knob
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Walton v. Capital One, N.A.
as 5:2024cv02788
Plaintiff:
Leah Walton
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Barrenechea et al
as 5:2024cv02779
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
David Emil Barrenechea individually and doing business as Fuego Grill & Sports Bar, Claudia Patricia Barrenechea individually and doing business as Fuego Grill & Sports Bar, Martin Barrenechea individually and doing business as Fuego Grill & Sports Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
