Cases 181 - 190 of 8,651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chaney Gooden v. Jackson Public Schools et al
as 3:2023cv03177
Plaintiff:
Vicki L. Chaney Gooden
Defendant:
Jackson Public Schools, Campus Enforcement, Roosevelt Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Roberts v. City of Booneville, MS et al
as 1:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Pamela Michelle Roberts
Defendant:
City of Booneville Mississippi, Booneville Police Department, Itawamba County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cocroft et al v. Graham et al
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Clarence Cocroft and Tru Source Medical Cannabis, LLC
Defendant:
Chris Graham, Pat Daily and Dr. Daniel P. Edney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carson v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv03063
Plaintiff:
Katie Fondren Carson
Defendant:
Rankin County, Mississippi, Bryan Bailey, Amanda Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
