Cases 11 - 20 of 30,377
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
NAGLE v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2024cv02028
Plaintiff:
DARREN NAGLE
Defendant:
UR M. JADDOU, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DAVID ROARK
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208
BLACK et al v. JAMES et al
as 1:2024cv00128
Defendant:
SOOMI JAMES, SUMI JAMES-BLACK, SUMI JAMES BLACK and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL P. BLACK, III, SAMUEL P. BLACK & ASSOCIATES D/B/A BLACK INSURANCE GROUP doing business as BLACK INSURANCE GROUP, ERIE MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Kline v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
Cynthia Ann Allen and Coverage One Insurance Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RS Land Investment, LLC
as 2:2024mc00027
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
RS Land Investment, LLC
UNIVERSAL TURBINE PARTS, LLC v. PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP. et al
as 2:2024cv02021
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSAL TURBINE PARTS, LLC
Defendant:
PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP., Pratt & Whitney Canada Holdings Corp. and P&WC Turbo Engines Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
