Cases 11 - 20 of 204
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration
Chavez v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Koby Chavez
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Polidi v. Mendel et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
Elizabeth U. Mendel, James O. Payne, Michelle K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Progressive Advanced Insurance Company v. Mendenhall
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Progressive Advanced Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jessica Mendenhall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Dick v. Barksdale et al
as 5:2024cv00001
Defendant:
John Coleman Barksdale, Jr., John Coleman Barksdale, Penske Logistics LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Rae Dick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Capital Hospice v. Becerra
as 1:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
Capital Hospice
Defendant:
Secretary Xavier Becerra, Xavier Becerra, Jessica D. Aber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
A10 Associates LLC et al v. McNamara
as 1:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
A10 Associates LLC and Jessica Tocco
Defendant:
Daniel McNamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
