Cases 11 - 20 of 132
Parker v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv01226
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Parker
Defendant:
Ivan Madrigal, Ismael Alvarado, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv50036
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HAN-A TOOLS CO., LTD. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv00520
Plaintiff:
HAN-A TOOLS CO., LTD.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", peritan, mericardo998 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Des Plaines Mobile Home Park, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03973
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Calvin M. Leung, Yolanda Casas-Gomez, Jose Quinonez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Chicago Freedom School et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv03718
Plaintiff:
Chicago Freedom School, Tony Alvarado-Rivera and Jacqulyn Hamilton
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, BACP Investigator Joseph W Sneed, BACP Investigator Ira Navarro, #338 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarado et al v. Daddy Cool's Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08442
Defendant:
Daddy Cool's Inc., Rich Kewitz, Rae L Hathaway and others
Plaintiff:
Steven McElheny, Madrid St. Angelo, Genesis Rios and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alvarado Ayala v. Saul
as 1:2019cv07559
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Ana Maria Alvarado Ayala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05529
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alvarado v. AUSP Thomson
as 1:2019cv04841
Petitioner:
Lawrence A Alvarado
Respondent:
Warden AUSP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
