Cases 11 - 20 of 257
Walker v. Nash et al
as 2:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Doyle Nash, Larry Wesley, Guy Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Walker v. O'Boyle et al
as 2:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Jack O'Boyle, Travis Grey and Patrick Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. Deltacon Global, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Doyle Harris
Defendant:
Deltacon Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Carty v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv01129
Plaintiff:
Shanon Doyle and Shanon Doyle Carty
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Jim Smith, Tina Vitola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Thornton v. Pittman et al
as 3:2023cv00129
Petitioner:
Shedrick Thornton
Respondent:
Michael Pittman, FNU Doyle, FNU Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Doyle et al v. Classic Crane and Transport, LP
as 9:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Caleb Doyle, Benton Buchanan and Charles Lee St. Andre
Defendant:
Classic Crane and Transport, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1554 Federal Fair Labor Standards Act
Thornton v. Pittman et al
as 3:2022cv02888
Petitioner:
Shedrick Thornton
Respondent:
Michael Pittman, FNU Doyle, FNU Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Doyle v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.
as 4:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
James Doyle
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Doyle v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv01091
Plaintiff:
Andrea Doyle
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
