Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Mosley et al v. Travis et al
as 1:2008cv05268
Plaintiff:
Osiris Mosley and Robin Mosley
Defendant:
Brion D. Travis, Robert Dennison, Gould and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Flemming v. Fischer et al
as 9:2009cv00005
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Donald Selsky, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Giambruno
as 1:2008cv00740
Petitioner:
Germaine Brown
Respondent:
Michael Giambruno
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Giambruno et al
as 1:2008cv01621
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jackson
Defendant:
Giambruno and October 14-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Giambruno et al
as 1:2008cv01620
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jackson
Defendant:
Giambruno, Sara Gurwich and Daniel Warshansky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Giambruno
as 7:2007cv11568
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brooks
Defendant:
Michael E. Giambruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giannattasio v. Goord et al
as 6:2007cv06555
Plaintiff:
Gregory Giannattasio
Defendant:
Glenn Goord, Lucien LeClaire, Stephen Bernardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giannattasio v. Goord et al
as 1:2007cv09402
Plaintiff:
Gregory Giannattasio
Defendant:
Glenn Goord, Lucien LeClaire, Stephen Bernardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clemons v. Department of Correctional Services et al
as 6:2007cv06435
Plaintiff:
James E. Clemons
Defendant:
Department of Correctional Services, Michael E. Giambruno and Wyoming Corr. Facility Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Giambruno
as 9:2007cv00657
Petitioner:
Michael Chavis
Respondent:
Michael Giambruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
