Cases 11 - 20 of 253
Chaney et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Defendant:
Holly Harris, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kentucky CVS Pharmacy, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Scott v. A. Vargez et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
A. Vargez, Jordan Rodriguez, J. Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troxell v. Jordan
as 6:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Destil Eugene Troxell
Respondent:
Warden Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grider v. Crews et al
as 5:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Reginald L Grider, Jr
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Randy White, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Jordan
as 3:2023cv00059
Petitioner:
Ricky Lee Welch
Respondent:
Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bentley v. Turner et al
as 7:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Roy N. Bentley
Defendant:
Christopher Turner, Floyd, Inc., Floyd, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Knights v. Jordan
as 3:2023cv00394
Petitioner:
Michael Lawrence Knights
Respondent:
Warden Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture - Exploitation of Children
Welch v. Jordan
as 5:2023cv00105
Petitioner:
Ricky Lee Welch
Respondent:
Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Litton v. Crews et al
as 3:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Clyde Litton
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Scott Jordan, KSP Unknown Correctional Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Scott County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00201
Defendant:
Latosha Jordan Tucker, Scott County Detention Center, Jailer Derran Broyles and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Conrad Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
