Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv25114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McNeely v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv25105
Plaintiff:
Jana L. McNeely
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNeely-Bean v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv22574
Plaintiff:
Regena McNeely-Bean
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNeely et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv07945
Plaintiff:
Nancy McNeely and James Braziel
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McNeely v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00767
Plaintiff:
Tina Michelle McNeely
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McNeely et al v. Soyoola et al
as 2:2012cv08727
Plaintiff:
Jamie L. McNeely and Trace James McNeely
Defendant:
Emmanuel O. Soyoola, MD , Olan Comprehensive Women's Healthcare Center and Oceanus Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
McNeely et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07063
Plaintiff:
Judy McNeely and Ronald McNeely
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McNeely et al v. IndyMac Bank
as 2:2010cv00904
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward McNeely and Virginia Back McNeely
Defendant:
IndyMac Bank
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
Campbell, et al v. Brook Trout Coal, LLC, et al
as 2:2007cv00651
Plaintiff:
Clinton H. Campbell, Clinton H. Campbell, Thomas W. Dillon and others
Defendant:
Brook Trout Coal, LLC, Magnum Coal Company, Magnum Coal Sales LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
