Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Nodine, et al v. Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., et al
as 3:2017cv00163
Plaintiff:
Kevin Nodine , Cheryl Morr and David Medlock
Defendant:
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Plains Pipeline, L.P. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooper v. Carnahan et al
as 1:2016cv01977
Plaintiff:
Darnell Cooper
Defendant:
Brett A. Carnahan, Charles Best, Lakeisha V. Acklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Evans et al
as 1:2015cv06465
Plaintiff:
Dimitrius Thomas
Defendant:
Michael L. Evans, Scott S. Nodine, Semmister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nodine v. Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. et al
as 3:2015cv00758
Plaintiff:
Kevin Nodine and David Medlock
Defendant:
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. , Plains Pipeline, L.P. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoskins v. Prentice et al
as 1:2015cv01248
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
S Prentice, Randy Pfister, B Schmeltz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Howe et al
as 1:2015cv01227
Plaintiff:
Marco Henderson
Defendant:
Howe, Bolte, . McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Attig et al
as 1:2015cv01202
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Defendant:
Jim B Attig, Patricia L West, Aberardo A Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2015cv50098
Defendant:
Michael Evans, Kelly Herrick, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Plaintiff:
Wade Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins et al v. Creech et al
as 1:2015cv01134
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Defendant:
K Prentice, C Creech, P Mcorinnis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luczak v. Pfister
as 1:2013cv01094
Plaintiff:
Theodore Luczak
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, . French, . Punke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
