Cases 11 - 20 of 2,938
Audette III v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
Robert Audette III
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhea et al v. Service Electric Company, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
David Rhea, Melvin Schuster and Tennessee Valley Operating Engineers Health Fund
Defendant:
Service Electric Company, LLC and Angela O'Conner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Gregory v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Johnny Gregory
Defendant:
David Johnson and TanTara Transportation Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Indigo Ag, Inc. v. Advanced Grain Farms, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02342
Plaintiff:
Indigo Ag, Inc.
Defendant:
Advanced Grain Farms, LLC and David Melcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Doe (RJC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RJC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe #068 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
John Doe #068
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #067 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
John Doe #067
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 MLC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #066 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
John Doe #066
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Helton v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Ricky M. Helton
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
