Cases 11 - 20 of 29
LSF 8 Master Participation Trust v. Stokes et al
as 9:2019cv00011
Counter Defendant:
Andre Collin, Danick Tremblay, Mackoff Kellogg Law Firm and others
Defendant:
William Young, Pamela J. Stokes, John Grayken and others
Plaintiff:
LSF 8 Master Participation Trust
Cross Defendant:
James Henderson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Ernst et al v Salmonson
as 6:2018cv00046
Petitioner:
Leslie Ernst, Jerry Henderson, Jason Fraker and others
Respondent:
James Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henderson v. Salmonson
as 2:2018cv00024
Respondent:
James Salmonson
Petitioner:
Jerry Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. CCCS, Inc. Provider McGreely et al
as 1:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Wallace
Defendant:
CCCS, Inc. Provider McGreely, CCCS, Inc. Provider Griffin, Kevin Dougherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Dr. Kohut et al
as 6:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
Richard Junious Hill, Sr.
Defendant:
Dr. Kohut, Dr. Henderson, Officer Rowlen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. CCCS, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Wallace
Defendant:
CCCS, Inc., Butte Pre-Release, Montana State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. CCCS, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv00075
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Wallace
Defendant:
CCCS, Inc., Montana State Prison, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Myotte et al
as 6:2016cv00058
Plaintiff:
Stacy G. Hall
Defendant:
Buddy Myotte, Alvin Fode, Trisdan Kohut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. USA
as 4:2016cv00076
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Patrick Lawrence Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Converse v. Kohut et al
as 6:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Converse
Defendant:
Tristan Kohut, Gerald Henderson, G Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
