Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Newsome et al v. All Pro Lock & Tow Inc
as 4:2011cv00005
Plaintiff:
Wanda Newsome , Catherine Estes and Shaunda Clark
Defendant:
All Pro Lock & Tow Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bey v. State of Georgia, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Nanya Sa'ud El HatChet Atta Bey
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Inc., Cobb County Gov. Inc., Cobb County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. State of Georgia, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03768
Plaintiff:
Sa'ud EL HatChe Bey
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Inc., Cobb County Gov. Inc., Cobb County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Streetman v. Barrett's Towing, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00080
Petitioner:
Mark Streetman
Respondent:
Barrett's Towing, Inc. and John Wayne Barrett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 b
Streetman v. Barrett's Towing, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02948
Plaintiff:
Mark Streetman
Defendant:
Barrett's Towing, Inc. and John Wayne Barrett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Moore et al v. Tolbert et al
as 2:2010cv00099
Plaintiff:
E. Darrell Moore , Felicia M. Scroggs and I-85 Garage and Towing, Inc.
Defendant:
Melvin Tolbert, Robert J. Russell, III, Mark Abruzzino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitley v. Franklin et al
as 1:2009mi00115
Plaintiff:
Roger Whitley
Defendant:
Shirley Franklin, S Page Porter and A-Tow Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. United States District Judicial et al
as 1:2008mi00001
Plaintiff:
Burnace Lerue Shaw, Jr.
Defendant:
ADT, Buckhead Towing, Inc., Clayton County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Doe et al
as 1:2007cv02880
Plaintiff:
Cherl Mitchell
Defendant:
Abe Doe, Bob Doe, Carl Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Doe et al
as 1:2007mi00338
Plaintiff:
Cherl Mitchell
Defendant:
Abe Doe, Bob Doe, Carl Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
