Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Ellison v. Yellowstone County et al
as 1:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Lionel Scott Ellison
Defendant:
Yellowstone County, Yellowstone County Attorneys Office, Scott Twito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
Kristofer Mikal Wright
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Kirkegard et al
as 2:2016cv00051
Petitioner:
Timothy Wright
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard, Burkpile and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Kirkegard et al
as 4:2016cv00097
Petitioner:
Timothy Wright
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard, Burkpile and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Busby et al
as 4:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wright
Defendant:
A. Busby, Duane Stewart, Douglas Fender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. USA
as 9:2016cv00085
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joseph Bernard Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wright v. USA
as 4:2016cv00040
Petitioner:
Rhonda Lee Wright
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Teague et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 9:2014cv00218
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Teague and Kathleen M. Teague
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Wright Medical Group, Inc. and John or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neff et al
as 9:2013cv00095
Plaintiff:
Dan Neff , Delores McConnell , Jean DeShazer and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Rodriguez v. Wright et al
as 4:2013cv00029
Defendant:
Timothy Wright, CASCADE COUNTY ADULT DETENTION REGIONAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CPL Bryce and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lonnie Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
