Cases 11 - 20 of 263
Crump (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv01611
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, N. Dominguez, United States of America and others
Petitioner:
Norvell Webster Clump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01643
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Petitioner:
Jacob Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dona't (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01698
Petitioner:
Safi Darrell Dona't
Respondent:
Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Labrum (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01651
Petitioner:
Daniel Cole Labrum
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crosby (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01435
Respondent:
M. Banuelos and A. Ciolli
Petitioner:
Gregory D Crosby and Gregory D Cosby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Keller et al
as 1:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Walter Johnson
Defendant:
Keller and A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01114
Petitioner:
Richard Reid
Respondent:
A. Ciolli, English, A. Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mendoza (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01545
Petitioner:
Rudy Mendoza
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1167
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Crosby (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01128
Petitioner:
Gregory D. Crosby and Gregory D. Cosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli and Fed. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
