Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Gomez v. Reynolds
as 3:2013cv00206
Respondent:
Kenneth Reynolds
Petitioner:
Moises Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurtado-Gomez et al v. McCleary et al
as 1:2012cv00606
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Hurtado-Gomez
Defendant:
Angenie McCleary, Tom Bowman, Lawrence Schoen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solis et al v. City of Gooding et al
as 1:2012cv00320
Plaintiff:
Lorena Solis , Alfredo Solis and Jesus Gomez
Defendant:
City of Gooding , Nick Schlader, Mike Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pleasant Valley Biofuels, LLC v. Quest Capital Finance, Inc et al
as 4:2012cv00229
Defendant:
Quest Capital Finance, Inc and Sanchez, Medina, Gonzalez, Quesada, Lage, Crespo & Gomez, LLP
Plaintiff:
Pleasant Valley Biofuels, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez v. Canyon County et al
as 1:2012cv00090
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gomez
Defendant:
Canyon County, Caldwell Police, Canyon Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. G & H Dairy, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2011cv00568
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
G & H Dairy, L.L.C. , Jesus M Hurtado , Gilbert M Hurtado and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 331
Dominguez-Gomez v. USA
as 1:2011cv00146
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Gomez-Regin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Raymond et al v. Canyon County et al
as 1:2010cv00269
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline M Raymond and Changing Behaviors, LLC
Defendant:
Canyon County , Canyon County Probation Department , Canyon County Adult Misdemeanor Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gomez v. Idaho State of
as 1:2008cv00226
Petitioner:
Oscar Gomez
Respondent:
Idaho State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gomez-Guevara v. USA
as 1:2007cv00445
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Francisco Gomez-Guevara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
