Cases 11 - 20 of 25,442
COLEY v. WOZNIAK et al
as 2:2024cv02685
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. COLEY
Defendant:
JOSHUA WOZNIAK, CORTY SMITH and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mays v. USP-Lewisburg et al
as 3:2024cv00999
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
USP-Lewisburg, A. Cotterall, Romig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
URBANO v. ACJ et al
as 2:2024cv00874
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. URBANO
Respondent:
ACJ and ACTING WARDEN SHANE DADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alexy v. Continental Casualty Company
as 2:2024cv02628
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Alexy
Defendant:
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY doing business as CNA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
AUSTIN v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02612
Plaintiff:
JANE AUSTIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Perirx, LLC v. Agnew et al
as 2:2024cv02601
Plaintiff:
Perirx, LLC
Defendant:
Linda A. Agnew, Paul J. Bloom, Keith H. Archer and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
MCVAUGH v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02566
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SIMMONS MCVAUGH
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02575
Plaintiff:
AISHA JONES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reynoso v. Greene
as 1:2024cv00967
Petitioner:
Yeffry Reynoso
Respondent:
J. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WATTS et al v. TATE et al
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
JOHN WATTS, TRAYVON J. TUMER, ELIJAH GIORDINA and others
Defendant:
ABBIE TATE, SHAUN EDMUNSON, BRENDA MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
