Cases 11 - 20 of 1,183
(SS) Maya v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Paubla Jimenez Maya
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Jimenez Maya v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00391
Plaintiff:
Paubla Jimenez Maya
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Jimenez v. Panda Restaurant Group, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03946
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A Jimenez
Defendant:
Panda Restaurant Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Nuno et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Nuno and Andrea G. Rubio Jimenez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Jimenez Jr. v. OE Federal Credit Union
as 3:2024cv02746
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jimenez Jr.
Defendant:
OE Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Miguel Gonzalo Jimenez v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03857
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL GONZALO JIMENEZ
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(PC) Nieto v. Allison et al
as 4:2024cv02628
Plaintiff:
Deputy D.A. Michael Nieto
Defendant:
Warden Kathleen Allison, Hernandez, Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Nieto v. Allison et al
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Michael Nieto
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Hernandez, Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
