Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Johnson et al v. Bowles et al
as 2:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Kent Johnson, Joshua Peterson, Grace Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Bryan Bowles, Cynthia Phillips, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fishback v. Carman et al
as 2:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Denis Fishback
Defendant:
Kista M. Carman, Tyrone Mitchell and Sherry Leckrone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyler v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2021cv00434
Plaintiff:
Rauri Mitchell Tyler
Defendant:
State of Utah, Third District Court and Taylee Foulger
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Edwards v. AT&T et al
as 2:2021cv00342
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, AT&T, Coinbase Global and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Mitchell v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00102
Interested Party:
SSA Notice
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00070
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mitchell v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00363
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Mitchell Heath v. Continental Tire The Americas et al
as 2:2020cv00317
Defendant:
General Tire de Mexico, Continental Tire the Americas and General Popo
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Heath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Mitchell International v. HealthLift Pharmacy Services et al
as 2:2019cv00637
Defendant:
Natalie Neil, HealthLift Pharmacy Services, Joseph Noll and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
