Cases 11 - 20 of 69
JONES v. WILLAMSON et al
as 5:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADDARRYL JONES and TUPAC DAVID SHAKUR
Defendant:
TERRANCE DENNIS, KELSIE WILLIAMSON, WARDEN BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowland v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05047
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Brandi Rowland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00894
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03736
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America, ex rel. et al v. MBM Solutions L.L.C., et al
as 1:2019cv01833
Defendant:
John Doe, MBM Solutions L.L.C. doing business as Avada Health, Cliff and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel., State of Alaska, ex rel., State of California, ex rel. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Rowland v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Kevin H. Rowland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE LEGACY AT DURHAM LP et al v. MONROE COUNTY, GEORGIA et al
as 5:2018cv00405
Plaintiff:
THE LEGACY AT DURHAM, L.P., WILKERSON GROUP, LTD., VANTAGE DEVELOPMENT, LLC and others
Defendant:
GREGORY V. TAPLEY, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, GEORGIA, MONROE COUNTY, GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00199
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
