Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Sims v. Aramark Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00016
Plaintiff:
Tashami Sims
Defendant:
Yunior Ramos, Naph Care, Bonnie Polley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. District Attorney Office et al
as 2:2017cv02996
Defendant:
J Dean, District Attorney Office, N Doble and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie L Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sims v. The New York State et al
as 3:2017cv00573
Defendant:
Neil J. Bernholz, Mrs Camino, Erie County Department of Social Services and others
Plaintiff:
Azujhon Kenneth Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Aranas et al
as 3:2017cv00543
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, M.D. M. Johns and John Keest
Plaintiff:
Azujhon Kenneth Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00733
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00131
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sims v. Albertson's LLC
as 2:2015cv00223
Defendant:
Albertson's Holdings, LLC, Albertson's LLC, Las Vegas Boulder Crossing Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Aretha Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Sims v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00682
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Victoria M. Sims
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Trost v. Cox et al
as 3:2014cv00611
Defendant:
Adams, Sgt. Armstead, Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Trost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sims v. Ralphs Grocery Company
as 2:2013cv02342
Defendant:
Ralphs Grocery Company
Plaintiff:
Joan Ida Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
