Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Allen Adams v. June Bishop, et al
as 13-14588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUNE BISHOP, Assistant Warden and LORI WILLIAMS
Allen Adams v. Victor Walker
as 13-14587
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
VICTOR L. WALKER
Allen Adams v. Sheila Perry, et al
as 13-14239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
SHEILA H. PERRY, Clerk of Superior Court Putnam County, RICE, Ms., Clerk, WILLIAM A. PRIOR, JR., Judge and others
ADAMS v. PERRY et al
as 5:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS
Defendant:
SHEILA H PERRY, RICE, WILLIAM A PRIOR, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. CHAPMAN
as 5:2013cv00225
Petitioner:
ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS
Respondent:
BRUCE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen Adams v. Robert Henderson, et al
as 13-10972
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HENDERSON, County Commissioner, ASSISTANT WARDEN, US MAGRISTRATE JUDGE and others
Adams v. Burnside et al
as 1:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS
Defendant:
BURNSIDE, Medical Boad of Atlanta Georgia, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Burnside et al
as 4:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
Allen Alphonzo Adams
Defendant:
Burnside, Medical Boad of Atlanta Georgia, Thomas Q. Langstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen Adams v. Robert Henderson, et al
as 12-15625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HENDERSON, County Commissioner, JUNE BISHOP, ASSISTANT WARDEN, THOMAS Q. LANGSTAFF, US MAGISTRATE JUDGE and others
Allen Adams v. Latish Wesley
as 12-14328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
LATISH A. WESLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
