Cases 11 - 20 of 2,910
Steelman
as 4:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Aurea Jane Steelman
Defendant:
Jason Andrew Steelman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603 International Child Abduction Remedies
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McGee v. Andrews et al
as 5:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Eric Jervon McGee
Defendant:
Warden Terry Andrews, Technician Buluti, Nurse Practician Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stover v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
M. Andrew Stover
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Edwards et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Betty Edwards and Andrew Edwards
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Isidienu v. UST General Contracting LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01284
Plaintiff:
Andrew Isidienu
Defendant:
UST General Contracting LLC, Christopher Roach, Lisa Wagley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID ***CASE TRANSFERRED TO LUFKIN***
as 6:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
