Cases 11 - 20 of 352
Jackson v. Hershberger et al
as 4:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson and Artemis Adams Anderson Andersen
Defendant:
Edwin Hershberger, Mike Reed, Damon Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eyster et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 5:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Laura M Eyster, Laura M Grisso and Craig Adam Eyster
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Glidewell v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Glidewell
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Founders Wellness LLC v. Adams
as 6:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Founders Wellness LLC
Defendant:
Latisha Adams
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Adams v. LNU et al
as 5:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Adams
Defendant:
FNU LNU and Turnkey Health Clinic LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Anthony Stewart
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isbill v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
George Isbill
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chaney v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Larry Chaney
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verdin v. Bowen
as 5:2023cv00812
Petitioner:
Rick Adam Verdin
Respondent:
Mark Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pringle v. Racconi et al
as 5:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
Charles Frank Pringle, Sr
Defendant:
Lawrence Racconi, Kimberly Racconi, ND EX West LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
