Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Waterman v. Board of Commissioners of Cherokee County, Kansas et al
as 5:2020cv03320
Defendant:
David Groves, Beau Hamlin, Michelle Tippie and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Waterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waterman v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare et al
as 5:2020cv03119
Defendant:
Danny Davis, Kristin Wagner, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Waterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbott v. Gay et al
as 6:2020cv01095
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sean Abbott
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and Chad Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbott v. Gay et al
as 5:2020cv03101
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sean Abbott
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and Chad Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colston v. Groves et al
as 5:2019cv03224
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wayne Colston
Defendant:
David Groves and Advanced Correctional Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortberg v. Groves et al
as 5:2019cv03219
Defendant:
David Groves, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and Cherokee County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Harvey Raymond Ortberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. v. McIntosh
as 2:2018cv02023
Plaintiff:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc.
Defendant:
Gary McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jolley v. Boone County Jail et al
as 5:2017cv03219
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Jolley
Defendant:
Boone County Jail and Advanced Correctional Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Regalado et al
as 5:2017cv03016
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Mack
Defendant:
(fnu) Regalado, (fnu) Anderson, (fnu) Floberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mochama v. Butler County et al
as 2:2014cv02121
Plaintiff:
Justine Osoro Mochama
Defendant:
Butler County, Kansas , Butler County Sheriff , Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
