Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Gaitan v. Rawers et al
as 1:2011cv00401
Plaintiff:
Raul Gaitan
Defendant:
Scott Rawers, Edward Alameida, E. Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serrano v. Rawers et al
as 1:2011cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jessie L. Serrano
Defendant:
Scott Rawers, Edward S. Alameida, Jr., E. Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. Ortiz, et al
as 1:2011cv00364
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. Ransom
Defendant:
D. Ortiz, A. Canton, P. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mychael T Shannon v. Edward S Alamedia
as 5:2003cv00375
Respondent:
Edward S Alameida, -
Petitioner:
Mychael Tyrone Shannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glenn L. Boyd Jr. v. Domingo Uribe Jr.
as 5:2010cv01648
Defendant:
Alameida, R Allen, S Barringer and others
Petitioner:
Glenn L Boyd, Jr.
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr.
Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00598
Respondent:
Edward S Alameida, Jr and Randolph L Candelaria
Petitioner:
Tommy Naylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Williams v. Santa Cruz, et al
as 1:2003cv06048
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Williams
Defendant:
A Santa Cruz , Derrel Adams and Edward S. Alameida, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Felker, et al
as 2:2003cv02415
Plaintiff:
Charles James Chatman
Defendant:
T. Felker, Edward S. Alameida, Jr., Richard W. Sandham and others
Respondent:
Linda Rianda, Robert Presley, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Tyner, et al
as 1:2003cv06636
Plaintiff:
Charles James Chatman
Defendant:
C Tyner , - Alameida, K W Prunty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jameson v. Rawers, et al., et al
as 1:2003cv05593
Plaintiff:
Barry S Jameson
Defendant:
Scott P Rawers , Edward S. Alameida, Jr. , E Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
