Cases 11 - 20 of 27
United States of America v. Lares
as 6:2010cv01072
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Alberto Lares
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Puon-Nicolas v. USA
as 6:2008cv01231
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alberto Puon-Nicolas
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bueno-Martinez v. USA
as 2:2007cv02437
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mario Alberto Bueno-Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Singh v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv02428
Plaintiff:
Harmail Singh
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Mohammad v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv02412
Plaintiff:
Hassan Mikhlif Mohammad
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Robert S. Mueller, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wang v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv02272
Plaintiff:
Qinghui Wang
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Michael Jaromin and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Hajjaj v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv02262
Plaintiff:
Samer Hajjaj
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez, Dr and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Azima v. Heinauer et al
as 2:2007cv02204
Plaintiff:
Farzin Azima
Defendant:
Gerard Heinauer, Michael Jaromin, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Shah v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv02205
Plaintiff:
Pir A Shah
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Gerard Heinauer and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Haque v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2007cv01118
Plaintiff:
A.K.M. Mahfuzul Haque
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
