Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Andrew Moret v. USDC-ORP
as 20-73538
Not Classified By Court:
R. BOSE, S. HOPSON, A. ASHENFELTER and others
Petitioner:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Moret v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv01757
Defendant:
Ernest Lannet, State of Oregon, Oregon Public Defense Services Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Guy Moret
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Andrew Moret v. Pat Garrett, et al
as 20-35829
Defendant / Appellee:
S. SIEMILLER, GODFRIED, M LLOYD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Andrew Moret v. Pat Garrett, et al
as 20-35563
Defendant / Appellee:
S. SIEMILLER, GODFRIED, M LLOYD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv77039
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GUY KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrew Moret v. Poornima Ranganathan, et al
as 19-36109
Defendant / Appellee:
POORNIMA RANGANATHAN and ANDREA DAILEY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant:
OREGON STATE HOSPITAL
Benjamin Barber v. Meagan Vance, et al
as 19-35778
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIE ATWOOD, Deputy District Attorney, ELLEN ROSENBLUM, Attorney General, ANDREW GUY MORET and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN BARBER
Phillips et al v. Calista Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01914
Defendant:
George Owletuck, Andrew Guy and Calista Corporation
Plaintiff:
Universal Praxis, Tiffany Phillips and Universal Praxis, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moret v. Oregon State Hospital et al
as 6:2018cv01105
Defendant:
Andrea Dailey, Oregon State Hospital and Poornima Ranganathan
Plaintiff:
Andrew Guy Moret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber et al v. Oregon et al
as 3:2018cv00855
Defendant:
Alabama, Arkansas, California and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Jay Barber, Chad Dykehouse, Jay David Leatherwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
