Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 557
BNSF Railway v. City of Edmond, et al
as 21-6005
Defendant / Appellant: CITY OF DAVIS, an Oklahoma municipal corporation and CITY OF EDMOND, an Oklahoma municipal corporation
Defendant: TODD HIETT, in his capacity as Chairman of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, BOB ANTHONY, in his capacity as Vice Chairman of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission and DANA MURPHY, in her capacity as Commissioner of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission
Intervenor Defendant: MIKE HUNTER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Plaintiff / Appellee: BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
BNSF Railway v. City of Edmond, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-6000
Defendant: CITY OF EDMOND, an Oklahoma municipal corporation and CITY OF DAVIS, an Oklahoma municipal corporation
Defendant / Appellant: TODD HIETT, in his capacity as Chairman of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, BOB ANTHONY, in his capacity as Vice Chairman of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission and DANA MURPHY, in her capacity as Commissioner of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission
Plaintiff / Appellee: BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: MIKE HUNTER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Burks v. Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
as 4:2020cv00555
Petitioner: Billy Ray Burks
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Lowe
as 20-6183
Petitioner: RONALD DEAN LOWE
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA and RON CHAMPION, Warden
Arndt v. Hatfield, et al
as 20-6128
Defendant / Appellee: BARBARA HATFIELD, individually and in her official capacity as Special District Judge for Canadian County, OK, YWCAOKC, STACY DILLARD, individually and in her official capacity as an attorney for the Department of Human Services for the State of Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID ARNDT, individually and as representative of all persons similarly situated
French v. Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
as 4:2020cv00091
Defendant: Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Plaintiff: Richard Willis French
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Benjamin Barber v. State of Oregon, et al
as 20-35051
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN BARBER
Defendant: SIMON, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon and ACOSTA, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon
Mehdipour v. Whitten et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00206
Petitioner: Faramarz Mehdipour
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma and Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Ray
as 19-6044
Respondent: TRACY MCCOLLUM, Warden, Oklahoma State Reformatory and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Petitioner: In re: LANCEY DARNELL RAY
Monckton v. Whitten et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00298
Respondent: Mark Whitten and The Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Petitioner: Michael Monckton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?