Cases 11 - 20 of 108
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03180
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2022cv03170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox (ID 98253) v. Zmuda
as 5:2022cv03154
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cox
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Jeff Butler and Tommy Williams
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. (lnu) et al
as 5:2022cv03109
Petitioner:
James Brent Watts
Respondent:
Lucifer (lnu), (fnu) (lnu) (1), (fnu) (lnu) (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee (ID 77035) v. Butler & Associates, P.A. et al
as 5:2022cv03090
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Lavell Lee
Defendant:
Butler & Associates, P.A., David M. Braun, Zachary A. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Anderson v. Tuxhorn et al
as 5:2022cv03018
Plaintiff:
Tommy Leroy Anderson
Defendant:
E. Tuxhorn, D. Robison, Leu Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Butler
as 5:2022cv03012
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Jeff Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
