Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Aurel v. Hoover, NPLP et al
as 1:2020cv01339
Defendant:
Janice Robinson, R.N., Wendy Orosco, CMA, Linae Llewellyn, LPN and others
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bready v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 8:2020cv01021
Defendant:
Cherie L. Henry, Dr. Contah Nimely, Dr. Druckman and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Bready
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mayers v. Contah et al
as 1:2019cv01756
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Mayers
Defendant:
Dr. Nimely Contah, Becky Barnhart and Corizon Medical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Bishop et al
as 8:2019cv01677
Plaintiff:
Kernell Williams
Defendant:
Warden Frank B. Bishop, Case Manager Jason McMahan, Acting Lieutenant David Barnhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Weeks v. Camuti et al
as 1:2019cv01525
Defendant:
Agent Carl Brian Hook, Judge Kenneth M. Long, Judge Donald E. Beachly and others
Plaintiff:
Lanell Weeks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hoffman v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2018cv01552
Plaintiff:
Michael J Hoffman
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Maryland Division of Correction, Frank Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurel v. Ashraf, MD et al
as 1:2017cv03695
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Mahbood Ashraf, MD, Holly L Pierce, CRNP, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bishop et al
as 8:2017cv01472
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
F. Bishop, W. Bohrer, S. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnhart v. Chesapeake Bay Seafood House Associates, L.L.C.
as 1:2016cv01277
Plaintiff:
Morgan Barnhart
Defendant:
Chesapeake Bay Seafood House Associates, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Barnhart v. Colvin
as 8:2016cv00629
Plaintiff:
Andre Barnhart
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
