Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Ninth Amendment Party Association et al v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Ninth Amendment Party Association and Milton Gerard Esquibel
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Clovis Watson, Jr., Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heaven v. Marion County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Jerome Heaven, Jr.
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff's Office, Billy Woods, FNU Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Heaven v. Woods et al
as 5:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jerome Heaven, Jr.
Defendant:
Billy Woods, FNU Harris, FNU Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heaven v. Woods et al
as 5:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Jerome Heaven, Jr.
Defendant:
Billy Woods, FNU Frye and FNU Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heaven v. Woods et al
as 5:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Jerome Heaven, Jr.
Defendant:
Billy Woods, FNU Moore, FNU Bones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Marion County Sheriff et al
as 5:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lamar Bryant
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff, Billy Woods and FNU Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Woods et al
as 5:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
James E Lyons
Defendant:
Billy Woods, Anna Marie Macafee, Alisha Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gillespie v. Woods
as 5:2022cv00013
Petitioner:
Neil Joseph Gillespie
Respondent:
Billy Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
