Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Franklin et al v. Whitfield et al
as 4:2014cv00065
Defendant:
Unit Capt. Kevin Blackshear, Roger Bowers, Unit Major Kimberly Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick D. Franklin, Andrew D. McGrew, Jr., Stephen Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackshear v. Johnson & Johnson Services Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01745
Plaintiff:
Kenyetta Blackshear
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Blackshear v. Thaler
as 6:2013cv00012
Petitioner:
Charles Alan Blackshear
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Swift et al
as 4:2012cv00036
Defendant:
Capt. FNU Benavides, Kevin Blackshear, Charles Crowe and others
Plaintiff:
David Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackshear v. Correll et al
as 1:2011cv00205
Plaintiff:
Timothy Blackshear
Defendant:
Yolanda M Correll, William J. Wheat, Melissa A Balderas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blachshear v. Romero et al
as 4:2010cv02250
Plaintiff:
Dontoya Blackshear
Defendant:
S Romero, V Garcia, LT T Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackshear v. Thaler
as 4:2010cv00214
Petitioner:
Dontoya Remond Blackshear
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blackshear v. Woodforest National Bank
as 4:2010cv00222
Plaintiff:
Dontoya Remond Blackshear
Defendant:
Woodforest National Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
