Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Bland et al v. Desarrollo e Investigacion Medica Aragonesa, S.L. et al
as 2:2014cv30494
Plaintiff:
Barbara Bland and Roy Glenn Bland
Defendant:
Desarrollo e Investigacion Medica Aragonesa, S.L. , Neomedic International, S.L. , Neomedic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv26406
Plaintiff:
Peggy Bland
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv23945
Plaintiff:
James Lawrence Bland
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv18182
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allan Bland
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bland v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv07955
Plaintiff:
Marjory A. Bland
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bland v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv06168
Plaintiff:
Cynthia L. Bland
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bland v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv23794
Plaintiff:
Marjory Bland
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bland et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02487
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Bland and Brian C. Bland
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bland et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv06748
Plaintiff:
Ethel L. Bland and Fred Bland
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blanding et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv01016
Plaintiff:
Marsha Blanding and Michael Blanding
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
