Cases 11 - 20 of 216
Board of Regents of the University System of Geor v. Thomas Crowther
as 23-90011
Petitioner:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA
Respondent:
THOMAS CROWTHER
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Heath et al v. MHM Correctional Services, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Antonio Heath, Crishaun Heath, Christen Heath and others
Defendant:
MHM Correctional Services, LLC, MHM Services, Inc., Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Leisa Garcia
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Michael Anderson, Marquette Sistrunk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
