Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Porter v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv00412
Plaintiff:
Glenn Arthur Porter
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Bobby Boone, David Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dopp v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv00306
Plaintiff:
Richard L Dopp
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Johnny Blevins, Randy Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv00305
Petitioner:
Gary R Thompson
Respondent:
Justin Jones, Randall G Workman, Bobby Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clayton v. Henry et al
as 5:2011cv00279
Plaintiff:
James E Clayton
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Mary Fallin, Justin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schram v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
L. Ray Schram, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma , Marty Sirmons , Linda Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers vs. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2011cv00121
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Vickers
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones, Bobbie Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Glenn Arthur Porter
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Bobby Boone, David Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Vicki LaGrange, et al
as 10-6271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
VICKI MILES LAGRANGE, U.S. District Judge, LEE R. WEST, District Director, U.S. District Judge, ROBIN CAUTHRON, District Director, U.S. District Judge and others
Defendant:
DREW EDMONDSON, Asst AG
Knox v. Morgan et al
as 5:2010cv01274
Petitioner:
Antone L A Knox
Respondent:
JoAnn Morgan, Randall G Workman, Bobby Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Berryhill v. Payne, et al
as 10-7075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES H PAYNE, U.S. District Judge, FRANK H. SEAY, U.S. District Judge, RANDALL WORKMAN, Warden, OSP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
