Cases 11 - 18 of 18
New Doe Child #1 et al v. Congress of the United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv00059
Plaintiff:
New Doe Child #1 , New Doe Child #2 , New Doe Parent and others
Defendant:
Congress of the United States of America, United States of America, U.S. Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Gorrell v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, et al
as 5:2012cv01693
Defendant:
Boeing Company , Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, A.W. Chesterton Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Lois Gorrrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Gorrell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 5:2012cv10002
Defendant:
BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration, Inc., Cytec Industries, Inc., Eaton Aeroquip Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lois Gorrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
John Doe v. Mentor Public School District BOE et al
as 1:2010cv01833
Defendant:
Mentor Public School District BOE, Jacqueline Hoynes and Joseph Spiccia
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krommer v. Turner et al
as 1:2009cv00516
Plaintiff:
Shawn Krommer
Defendant:
David Turner, Keith Boeing, Michael Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loper v. Boeing Company et al
as 2:2007cv00217
Plaintiff:
Donna Loper
Defendant:
Boeing Company and Aetna Life Insurance Company
ThirdParty Defendant:
Karen Loper
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Counter Claimant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Counter Defendant:
Donna Loper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Mayo v. Rockwell Internation, et al
as 2:2001cv00843
Plaintiff:
Robert Mayo
Defendant:
Rockwell Internation, Rockwell Retirement Plan, Boeing North American Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
