Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Cooper v. Collins et al
as 7:2018cv00536
Defendant:
C/O Barry Mullins, C/O D. Webb, C/O Maloney and others
Plaintiff:
Israel Ray Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slavin et al v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
David Slavin , John Bradham , Aaron Bryant and others
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00763
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Bray v. McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, LLC
as 1:2015cv01596
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bray
Defendant:
McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bray et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02739
Plaintiff:
Scott and MaryAnne Bray and Karen Warshaw
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abdurahman et al v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLC, et al
as 3:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
Alim Abdurahman, John Abel, Lena Abel and others
Defendant:
Alexandria Hyundai, LLC, Brown's Leesburg Hyundai, LLC, Brown's Manassas Hyundai, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins v. Cobalt Coal, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00004
Defendant:
Verne Bray, Cobalt Coal, LLC and R Jacob Steele
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dwayne Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Gordon v. Mullins et al
as 7:2012cv00494
Defendant:
D. Ball, Officer Barter, Bray and others
Plaintiff:
Carl D. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strickland v. Wang et al
as 7:2011cv00358
Defendant:
"Brian" (unknown), Sgt. Bray, Director and others
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strickland v. Wang et al
as 7:2011cv00246
Defendant:
"Brian", Sgt. Bray, Harold Clark and others
Interested Party:
Office Of The Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
