Cases 11 - 20 of 77
State of California, et al v. EPA
as 21-1035
Petitioner:
City of Boulder, District of Columbia, City of Los Angeles and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
California Air Resources Board, et al v. American Petroleum Institute, et al
as 20-16801
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior;, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FORT BERTHOLD PROTECTORS OF WATER AND EARTH RIGHTS, CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, WESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING, INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and others
California Air Resources Board, et al v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 20-16794
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior;, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FORT BERTHOLD PROTECTORS OF WATER AND EARTH RIGHTS, CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, WESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
California Air Resources Board, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-16793
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FORT BERTHOLD PROTECTORS OF WATER AND EARTH RIGHTS, CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, WESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior;, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
USA v. State of California, et al
as 20-16789
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California, MARY D, NICHOLS, Chairman, in her official capacity as Chair of the California Air Resources Board, RICHARD BLOOM, in his official capacity as a board member of the Western Climate Initiative, Inc. and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS TRADING ASSOCIATION and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 20-1367
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
State of New Jersey, State of Illinois, State of North Carolina and others
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al v. DAIMLER AG et al
as 1:2020cv02565
Defendant:
MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC and DAIMLER AG
Plaintiff:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 20-1357
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
State of New Jersey, State of Illinois, State of Colorado, by and through Attorney General Philip J. Weiser and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and others
State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 20-1167
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, James C. Owens, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and others
Petitioner:
State of Colorado, City of Los Angeles, State of New Jersey and others
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2020cv01293
Defendant:
NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION and UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
