Cases 11 - 20 of 971
CASEY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CASEY
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. 1st Stop Auto LLC, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00368
Defendant:
1st Stop Auto LLC, Inc. and First Stop Auto LLC, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Casey O. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASEY v. MCQUAY
as 5:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE CASEY
Defendant:
ZACHARY MCQUAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv20033
Plaintiff:
Casey Johnson
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Harris v. Gibson
as 6:2023cv02476
Plaintiff:
Tarick Donta Harris
Defendant:
Casey R. Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patel v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2023cv02924
Petitioner:
Sean Casey Patel
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CASEY v. AT&T INC et al
as 5:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE LEE CASEY
Defendant:
AT&T INC, INDENTURE TRUSTEE, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY NA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASEY v. CREWS
as 5:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE LEE CASEY
Defendant:
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHTS COMPANY, DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, JAMES BRIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kemerly v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2023cv24690
Plaintiff:
Casey Kemerly
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
CASEY v. INNOVATION FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 5:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE LEE CASEY
Defendant:
INNOVATION FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION and JEREMY HINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
