Cases 11 - 20 of 64
RODRIGUEZ-FERREIRA v. SWEENEY et al
as 2:2021cv00028
Respondent:
CINDY SWEENEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
DARWIN RODRIGUEZ-FERREIRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CODY v. SWEENEY et al
as 2:2020cv20387
Respondent:
CINDY SWEENEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
VICTOR CODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GEORGES v. FIOIRE et al
as 2:2020cv13561
Plaintiff:
ASHELY GEORGES
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN PORROVECCHIO, CINDY SWEENEY, JAMES SLAUGHTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CODY v. SWEENEY et al
as 2:2020cv12919
Respondent:
CINDY SWEENEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
JOSEPH CODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARATINI v. POWELL et al
as 1:2020cv08924
Defendant:
DAVID METELOW, ASST. SUPERINTENDENT LISA SWIFT, SCO. APRIL WASHINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
PETER L. CARATINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEORGES v. GABRIEL et al
as 2:2020cv05803
Defendant:
CINDY SWEENEY, AHAB GABRIEL, BARRINGTON LYNCH and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY GEORGES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUSE v. STARKS et al
as 2:2016cv03422
Plaintiff:
TERRY ROUSE
Defendant:
STARKS, LITTLE, CINDY SWEENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANSO v. SWEENEY et al
as 2:2016cv02336
Petitioner:
LUIS MANSO
Respondent:
CINDY SWEENEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAWKINS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2016cv02321
Petitioner:
VINCENT HAWKINS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY and CINDY SWEENEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRANKLIN v. SWEENEY et al
as 2:2016cv01112
Petitioner:
STEFAN ANTHONY FRANKLIN
Respondent:
CINDY SWEENEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
