Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Robinson v. Crickmar et al
as 5:2018cv00097
Defendant: Warden Emmons Shawn, Scott Crickmar, Commissioner Gregory Dozier and others
Plaintiff: Derrick Edward Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. CRICKMAR et al
as 7:2018cv00207
Defendant: SHAWN EMMONS, SCOTT CRICKMAR and Commissioner GREGORY DOZIER
Plaintiff: DERRICK EDWARD ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00461
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
WHITE v. BOWEN
as 5:2018cv00429
Defendant: DEPUTY WARDEN MICHAEL THOMAS, COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER and WARDEN TOMMY BOWEN
Plaintiff: JONATHON MATTHEW WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. DOZIER et al
as 1:2018cv00202
Defendant: J BLOCKER, Warden WALTER BERRY, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff: JESSE GUNTER ANDERSON, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOOTH v. BOBBIT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00367
Plaintiff: DELROY T BOOTH
Defendant: WARDEN BOBBIT, UNIT MANAGER FARLEY and COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRELL v. CALHOUN STATE PRISON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00332
Respondent: CALHOUN STATE PRISON, COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Petitioner: WILLIE JAMES TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CORMICAN v. DOZIER
as 5:2018cv00319
Defendant: Commissioner GREGORY DOZIER
Plaintiff: JAMES ELIAS CORMICAN, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUDY v. DOZIER et al
as 1:2018cv00165
Defendant: Chaplain SIMMONS, Cert Sgt MUZZY, Commissioner GREGORY DOZIER and others
Plaintiff: MITCHELL LUDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOGAN v. DEAL et al
as 1:2018cv00131
Plaintiff: RICKY LAMAR HOGAN
Defendant: GOVERNOR NATHAN DEAL, STATE ATTORNEY GENER CHRISTOPHER CARR and COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?