Cases 11 - 20 of 142
Brown v. Koenig et al
as 5:2022cv00881
Plaintiff:
Lamarr F Brown
Defendant:
Warden Craig Koenig and L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Koenig et al
as 4:2022cv00870
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Powell
Defendant:
Craig Koenig and L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Posson et al
as 5:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Glenn Davis
Defendant:
S. Posson, M. Sweet, Steven Posson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dalton v. Koenig
as 4:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Alvin Henry Dalton
Defendant:
Warden Craig Koenig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Allison et al
as 4:2021cv09741
Plaintiff:
Trevillion Ward
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Koenig Craig, K. Mensing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2021cv09586
Plaintiff:
Mr. Talib Williams and Dimario Pickford
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR Kathleen Allison, Warden Craig Koenig and others
Intervenor:
Milton William
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)King v. Koenig et al
as 2:2021cv02250
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lynell King
Defendant:
Craig Koenig, Gigi Metteson, Eric Brignell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton et al v. Patterson et al
as 4:2021cv08545
Plaintiff:
William Milton, Shelton Adams, Robert Blackwell and others
Petitioner:
William Pardue
Defendant:
Ronald R. Patterson, State of California, Craig Koenig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Chad Giese v. Craig Koenig
as 2:2021cv08535
Petitioner:
Charles Chad Giese
Respondent:
Warden Craig Koenig and Craig Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Giese v. Koenig
as 2:2021cv08500
Petitioner:
Charles Chad Giese
Respondent:
Craig Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
